THE CHARACTER OF KOLIA KRASOTKIN IN THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV
PDF/A

Keywords

Kolya Krasotkin
The Brothers Karamazov
Rationalism
Atheism
Utopian Socialism
19th-Century Russian Literary Philosophy

How to Cite

Nguyen, Q. T. (2025). THE CHARACTER OF KOLIA KRASOTKIN IN THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV: A SYMBOL OF YOUNG RUSSIAN INTELLIGENTSIA AMIDST THE IDEOLOGICAL WAVE OF THE 19TH CENTURY. Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.59079/isagoge.v5i1.260

Abstract

 The character Kolya Krasotkin in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “The Brothers Karamazov” appears infrequently, but is strongly connected to the ideological transformations of Russia during the period of transitioning development models after the Peasant Reform of 1861 (Nguyen et al., 2024). In this context, even a child can mature prematurely due to the rapid impact of social realities. Kolya can be seen as a spiritual symbol of the young Russian intelligentsia during this stage of ideological ferment. This period was characterized by a vibrant atmosphere with an interweaving of different, even opposing, intellectual currents; specifically, Western philosophical trends of the 18th-19th centuries, especially French Enlightenment thought, including Voltaire and Diderot. Throughout “The Brothers Karamazov,” Kolya Krasotkin is depicted as an adolescent archetype with an aspiration to reach intellectual maturity, yet still wavering and impulsive in his choice of ideals. This choice lies between scientific materialism, atheistic thought, and religious faith, influenced by Alyosha Karamazov. Through Kolya’s case, Dostoevsky conveys a profound philosophical message about the mood and aspirations of the young Russian generation in their ideological choices during this historical transitional period: they might go astray due to “rationalist illusions” but can also find the light of truth if they learn to reconcile reason with faith. Kolya Krasotkin is often considered a minor character and has not been deeply analyzed. This article aims to contribute to the study of Kolya Krasotkin’s role as a philosophical symbol in the context of contemporary Russia. He is a contradictory figure: both superficial and profound, both upright, benevolent, and altruistic, yet also extreme, embodying a naive voluntarism in his worldview.

https://doi.org/10.59079/isagoge.v5i1.260
PDF/A

References

Avramenko, R., & Trepanier, L. (2013). Dostoevsky’s political thought. Lexington Books. https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780739172249

Encyclopædia Britannica. (2019). Fathers and sons – novel by Turgenev. Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Fathers-and-Sons-novel-by-Turgenev

Chernyshevsky, N. G. (1989a). What is to be done? (M. Katz, Trans.). Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1863)

Chernyshevsky, N. G. (1989b). What is to be done? (Nguyễn Văn Hạnh, trans.). Hanoi: Literature Publishing House. (Original work published in 1863)

Coffin, B. (2004). Kolya Krasotkin and the importance of community in The Brothers Karamazov. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 40(1), 70–82. https://academic.oup.com/fmls/article/40/1/70/560997

Diderot, D., & d’Alembert, J. L. R. (Eds.). (1751–1772). Ame. Encyclopédie, Vols. 1–17 (p. 106–112). https://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/did/

Dostoyevsky, F. (1912). The brothers Karamazov (C. Garnett, Trans.) [E-book]. Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/28054 (Original work published in 1879–1880)

Dostoyevsky, F. (2013). The brothers Karamazov (Phạm Mạnh Hùng trans.). Hanoi: Literature Publishing House. (Original work published in 1879–1880).

Dostoyevsky, F. (2021). Crime and punishment (Thiên Lương trans.). Hanoi: Literature Publishing House. (Original work published in 1866).

Frank, J. (1995). Dostoevsky: The mantle of the prophet, 1871–1881 (pp. 527–548). Princeton University Press.

Golstein, V. (2023). A happy guest in Russia’s pages. Claremont Review of Books. https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/a-happy-guest-in-russias-pages/

Grossman, L. (1950). Dostoyevsky: A biography (M. K. Roden, Trans., pp. 388–403). Pantheon Books.

Jackson, R. L. (1986). Dialogues with Dostoevsky: The overwhelming questions (pp. 201–213). Stanford University Press.

Jones, M. V. (1990). Dostoevsky’s dialectic and the problem of sin. The Slavonic and East European Review, 68(3), 393–409. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4210201

Nguyen, T.Q. & Do, T. (2024). Metaphysics of loneliness in Dostoevsky’s view of life: essence and issues posed. Synesis, v. 16, n. 1, 2024, pp.582-600. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2994/3762.

Nguyen, T.Q. & Do, T. (2025). Dostoevsky’s Existential Philosophy: A New Contribution to Freedom, Kalagatos, vol.22, No.2, 2025, eK25023

https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/kalagatos/article/view/15245

Melson, R. (2006). The Brothers Karamazov & the Russia of the 1860s. Cambridge Forecast Group. https://cambridgeforecast.wordpress.com/2006/12/30/the-brothers-karamazov-and-the-russia-of-the-1860s/

Miller, R. F. (2008). Dostoevsky’s unfinished journey (pp. 175–192). Yale University Press.

Morson, G. S. (2023). Wonder confronts certainty: Russian writers on the timeless questions (pp. 211–226). Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674293894

Pisarev, D. (1862). Destruction as a means of construction. In Essays in Russian nihilism (pp. 21–34). Moscow University Press.

Riley, D. (2010). Hegel, ideology and Dostoevsky. Critical Historical Studies, 1, 97–121. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/CHS255

Rowe, W. W. (1985). Dostoevsky, the ridiculous man, and the liberal ironist. Modern Language Quarterly, 46(4), 371–386. https://read.dukeupress.edu/modern-language-quarterly/article/46/4/371/15377

Saunders, E. (1997). Fathers and sons: Bazarov and the problem of nihilism. Slavic Review, 56, 302–317. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/slavic-review

Scanlan, J. P. (2002). Dostoevsky and socialism. Slavic Review, 61(1), 44–62. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/slavic-review/article/abs/dostoevsky-and-socialism/ EB4C1C8C4BA1DC

Tilley, T. W. (2023). The Karamazov case: Dostoevsky’s argument for his vision (pp. 98–111). T&T Clark. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/karamazov-case-9780567701239/

Tomlinson, M. B. (2015). Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment and the problem of evil. SUNY Honors Conference Proceedings, 4–10.

Voltaire. (1759). Candide ou l’Optimisme (pp. 43–58). Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/19942 (Original work published 1759)

Voltaire. (1763). Traité sur la tolérance (p. 152). Gallimard. https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/voltaire-a-treatise-on-tolerance

Young, S. F. (2006). Ideology and utopia in Dostoevsky’s fiction. Russian Review, 65(3), 404–420. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9434.2006.00389.x

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences