Resumo
Esta revisão abrangente explora a evolução das capacidades dinâmicas para as capacidades dinâmicas verdes (GDCs) no contexto das práticas empresariais sustentáveis. Examina os fundamentos teóricos, os fatores impulsionadores e os desafios para o desenvolvimento das GDCs em diversos setores. O estudo destaca o papel crítico das GDCs em permitir que as empresas identifiquem, aproveitem e reconfigurem recursos para enfrentar desafios ambientais, mantendo a competitividade. Os principais achados revelam que as GDCs são impulsionadas por fatores como regulamentações ambientais, pressões de mercado e orientação estratégica, exigindo uma abordagem proativa para a sustentabilidade. A revisão identifica barreiras organizacionais e problemas de implementação como desafios significativos na operacionalização das GDCs, especialmente para pequenas e médias empresas (PMEs). Ressalta a importância da inovação aberta e das interações em ecossistemas para fomentar soluções sustentáveis. O artigo conclui discutindo as implicações teóricas e práticas, incluindo a necessidade de integrar a sustentabilidade nas estratégias centrais de negócios e de desenvolver frameworks padronizados para medir o progresso. São propostas direções para pesquisas futuras, com foco em variações contextuais, microfundamentos e na integração de tecnologias digitais no desenvolvimento das GDCs.
Referências
AMUI, L. B. L.; JABBOUR, C. J. C. DE SOUSA JABBOUR, A. B. L.; KANNAN, D. Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, p. 308–322, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103.
BARNEY, J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 99–120, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.
BIANCHI, G.; TESTA, F.; TESSITORE, S.; IRALDO, F. How to embed environmental sustainability: the role of dynamic capabilities and managerial approaches in a life cycle management perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 31, n. 2, p. 312–325, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2889.
BRAUN, V.; CLARKE, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77–101, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
CHENG, Y. Strategic integration of green practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 29, n. 7, p. 1300–1315, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2421.
DAHLQUIST, S. H. How green product demands influence industrial buyer/seller relationships. Journal of Business Research, v. 136, p. 402–413, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.045.
DANGELICO, R. M.; PUJARI, D. Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 95, n. 3, p. 471–486, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0.
EISENHARDT, K. M.; MARTIN, J. A. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, v. 21, n. 10‐11, p. 1105–1121, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11.
HELFAT, C. E.; PETERAF, M. A. Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, v. 7, n. 1, p. 91–102, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100133.
KHAN, S. J.; KAUR, P.; JABEEN, F.; DHIR, A. Green process innovation: where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 30, n. 15, p. 3273–3296, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2802.
KRAUS, S.; BREIER, M.; DASÍ-RODRÍGUEZ, S. The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, v. 16, n. 3, p. 1023–1042, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4.
LIBERATI, A.; ALTMAN, D. G.; TETZLAFF, J.; MULROW, C.; GØTZSCHE, P. C.; IOANNIDIS, J. P.; ... MOHER, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 62, n. 10, p. e1–e34, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006.
MOHER, D.; LIBERATI, A.; TETZLAFF, J.; ALTMAN, D. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, v. 339, p. b2535, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.
MOUSAVI, S.; BOSSINK, B.; VAN VLIET, M. Microfoundations of dynamic green capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 27, n. 8, p. 1243–1256, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2255.
OKOLI, C.; SCHABRAM, K. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, v. 10, n. 26, p. 1–49, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824.
PAGE, M. J.; MCKENZIE, J. E.; BOSSUYT, P. M.; BOUTRON, I.; HOFFMANN, T. C.; MULROW, C. D.; ... MOHER, D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, v. 372, p. n71, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
PETERAF, M.; DI STEFANO, G.; VERONA, G. The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: bringing two diverging conversations together. Strategic Management Journal, v. 34, n. 12, p. 1389–1410, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2078.
POPAY, J.; ROBERTS, H.; SOWDEN, A.; PETTICREW, M.; ARAI, L.; RODGERS, M.; ... DUFFY, S. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Programme, 2006.
SNYDER, H. Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, v. 104, p. 333–339, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
TEECE, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n. 13, p. 1319–1350, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.
TEECE, D. J. Dynamic capabilities: routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, v. 49, n. 8, p. 1395–1401, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x.
TEECE, D. J. Hand in glove: open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Review, v. 1, n. 2, p. 233–253, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000010.
TEECE, D. J.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 7, p. 509–533, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250180702.
TRANFIELD, D.; DENYER, D.; SMART, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, v. 14, n. 3, p. 207–222, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
ZAHRA, S. A.; GEORGE, G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, v. 27, n. 2, p. 185–203, 2002. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995.
ZOLLO, M.; WINTER, S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, v. 13, n. 3, p. 339–351, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780.

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences