Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Scapegoatism as a metaphor for selfless or altruistic leadership and patriotism is a prominent motif in Wole Soyinka's dramatic oeuvre. Based on ritualisation of theatre through martyrdom syndrome adapted from the mystic cultural worldview of the Yoruba, human sacrifice is emphasised as a transformational apparatus for cleansing and for social redemption in his plays. Besides Death and the King's Horseman, his The Strong Breed is premised on human sacrifice as a means for averting social disruption or communal tragedy. However, critics and scholars have advanced that Femi Osofisan's No More the Wasted Breed parodies Soyinka's The Strong Breed on the basis of the needlessness to waste an icon before restoration of order and peace in society materialises. Against this backdrop, this paper attempted a comparative study of the two texts deploying the new historicist literary theory for analysis with concentration on the popular scholarly opinion of the latter text's critique on the former play. The researchers found out that the latter (Osofisan's No More the Wasted Breed) is still an atavistic echo of the former (the text it criticises) because it is not an outright condemnation of human sacrifice, it only succeeds in questioning the class from which the prey is chosen. The paper then concluded that the so-called superior argument or antithesis of No More the Wasted Breed is not impeccable as regards the logical formula for social re-ordering and regeneration.
References
Adedeji, J. (2005). “Aesthetics of Soyinka’s theatre” In D. Adelugba (ed.) Before our very eyes: Tribute to Wole Soyinka. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Limited.
Awodiya, M. (1993). Excursion in drama and literature: Interview with Femi Osofisan. Ibadan:
Kraft books.
Ajidahun C. O. (2012) “No More The Wasted Breed: Femi Osofisan’s Vitriolic and Ideological Response to Wole Soyinka’s The Strong Breed” in English language and literature studies. Canada: Canadan Centre of Science and Education
Bhadmus, M.O. (2006). “The popular theatre and radical aesthetics of Femi Ososfisan” in A. Raji-Oyelade and O. Okunoye (eds.) The postcolonial lamb: Essays in honour of Dan Izevbaye.Ibadan: Bookcraft.
Bishop, N. (1983). “A Nigerian version of a Greek classic: Soyinka’s transformation of the
Bacchae” in J. Gibbs (ed.) Research in African literature, Vol. 14. Texas: University of Texas.
Brockbank, P. (2001). “Blood and wine: Tragic ritual from Aeschylus to Soyinka” in B. Jeyifo (ed.) Perspective on Wole Soyinka: Freedom and complexity. USA: University Press of Missisippi.
Dobie, A .B. (2009). Theory into practice: An introduction to literary criticism second edition. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Crow, B. (2005). “Soyinka and the Romantic tradition” In D. Adelugba (ed.).) Befoe our very eyes: Tribute to Wole Soyinka. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Limited.
Dobie, A. B. (2009).Theory into practice: An introduction to literary criticism second edition. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Gbilekaa, S. (1997). Radical theatre in Nigeria, p.38. Ibadan: Caltop Publications lmt.
Griffiths, G. (2000). African literature in English: East and West. London: Longman.
Jones, E. (1973). The writing of Wole Soyinka. London: Heinemann.
Lyu, X. An introduction to new historicism . Pdf Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 543 Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2021) Atlantic Press.
Montrose, L. (1989). “Professing the Renaissance: The poetics and politics of culture”. In H. A.
Veeser (ed.) The new historicism. New York: Routeledge Book.
Obafemi, O. (1996). Contemporary Nigerian theatre: Cultural heritage and social vision. Lagos:
CBAA.
Osakwe,C. (2018). The revolutionary drama and theatre of Femi Osofisan. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ogungbesan, K. (1975).“Wole Soyinka: The past and the visionary writer” In K. Bruce and K.
Ogungbesan (eds.) A celebration of black and African writing. Zaria: Ahmadu Bello University Press.
Osofisan, F. (1982). Morountodun and other plays. Nigeria: Longman.
Osofisan, F. (1998). Playing dangerously: Drama at the frontiers of terror in a post-colonial state, p.83. Ibadan: University Press.
Osofisan, F. (2001). “Wole Soyinka and the living dramatist” in B. Jeyifo (ed.) Perspective on Wole Soyinka: Freedom and complexity. USA: University Press of Missisippi.
Quayson, A. (2001). “The space of transformations: Theory, myth and ritual in the works of Wole Soyinka”In B. Jeyifo (ed.) Perspective onWole Soyinka: Freedom and complexity. USA: University Press of Missisippi.
Raji, W. (2006). “Urban dislocation and postcolonial transformation in the plays of Femi
Osofisan” in A. Raji-Oyelade and O. Okunoye (eds.) The postcolonial lamb: Essays in honour of Dan Izevbaye.Ibadan:Bookcraft.
Soyinka, W. (1973). Collected plays. London: Oxford University Press.
Uji, C. “The main themathologic precoccupation of Femi Osofisan’s radical drama”. Pdf.
Veeser, A. H. (1989). The New Historicism. New York: Routledge.
Derek Wright “Ritual and Reveolution: S oyinka’s Dramatic Thoery”, ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 23:1, Online e-article. Synergies Prairie Node. (January 1992) p. 42
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences