Abstract
Supervision plays a vital role in the completion of the research project in the bachelor’s degree programmes (Askew et al., 2016). Changes in the delivery of research programmes at the university level have, in recent years, resulting in significant changes to research supervision (McCallin & Nayar, 2012). Especially, the global pandemic COVID-19 has forced academics to be engaged to find out alternative strategies to supervise their students (Wisker, et al. 2021). On other hand, the Covid-19 pandemic had negative effects on the process of research of the programmes (Boufenchoucha & Chandra, 2021). The aim of this study is to innovate the Alternative Supervision Practices for Completion of the Action Research Projects of the BEDSNE programme offered by OUSL during the COVID-19 Pandemic Situation. A fully qualitative approach was followed to conduct this study and a multiple case study design was utilized to conduct the study. The target population was 86 students, and 4 students were supervised by a particular supervisor selected by using the convenience sampling method. Data was collected using reflective journals and semi-structured in-depth interviews. The thematic analysis technique was utilized to analyse the data. The findings: all four students lack knowledge and never skills in action research. Online supervision support to get regular support from the supervisor, time management, managing unnecessary cost, peers, and family members. ZOOM is good for meeting with the supervisor, email is good for sharing the documents with the supervisor and getting immediate feedback from the supervisor, and social media support for the communicating with supervisor and getting support from peers. Online supervision has more advantages than onside supervision. Conclusion: online supervision is more appropriate to supervise the action research of bachelor students in the Open and Distance Education (ODL) mode. Recommendation: supervisors can use online supervision strategies to supervise students in prevailing situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic crisis of Sri Lanka.
References
Amanvermez, Y., Zeren, S. G., Erus, S. M., & GENC, A. B. (2020). Supervision and peer supervision in an online setting: Experiences of psychological counselors. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(86), 249-268.
Askew, C., Dixon, R., McCormick, R., Callaghan, K., Wang, G. Y., & Shulruf, B. (2016). Facilitators and barriers to doctoral supervision: A case study in health sciences. Issues in Educational Research, 26(1), 1-9.
Baker, M. J., Cluett, E., Ireland, L., Reading, S., & Rourke, S. (2014). Supervising undergraduate research: A collective approach utilizing group work and peer support. Nurse Education Today, 34(4), 637-642.
Boufenchoucha, A., & Chandra, O. H. (2021). The Impact of Covid-19 on Research Process Case of Study Master 2 EFL Students at The University of Mohammed Seddik Ben Yahia, Jijel-Algeria. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 317, p. 05009). EDP Sciences.
Crawford. J & Cifuentes-Faura. J. (2022). Sustainability in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031879
El Rafae. G. A, Kaba. A & Letter. S. (2021). Distance learning during Covid-19 pandemic: satisfaction, opportunities and challenges as perceived by faculty members and students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. 18(3), 298-318. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0128
Faizi, R., El Afia, A., & Chiheb, R. (2013). Exploring the potential benefits of using social media in education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 3(4), 50-53.
Gamage, S. (2020). What did we learn about distant education during the lockdown, new paper Daily FT, Sri Lanka
Henry. M. A & Weber. A, (2010). Supervising Student Teachers- The Professional Way (7th Ed). Rowman Littlefield Publishers, Inc
Ketheeswaran, K., & Mukunthan, T. (2016). Usage of smartphones for learning purposes by students who follows ‘diploma in commonwealth youth development programs’ in the Colombo and Batticaloa centers of the open university of Sri Lanka. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 21(5), 75-78.
Lamaster. K.J & Knop. N. (2007). Improving web-based instruction: using action research to enhance distance learning instruction. Educational Action Research. 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790400200257
Lunenberg. M, Dengerink. J & Korthagen. F, (2014). The Professional Teacher Educator- Roles, Behaviour and Professional Development of Teacher Educators (Vol-13). Sense Publishers
Luo, C. (2008). An Action Research Plan for Developing and Implementing the Students' Listening Comprehension Skills. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 25- 28.
McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63-74.
Metcalf, K. K. (1991). The supervision of student teaching: A review of research. The Teacher Educator 26(4): 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878739109554988
Mosley, M. A., Parker, M. L., & Call, T. (2022). MFT supervision in the era of telehealth: Attachment, tasks, and ethical considerations. Journal of Family Therapy, 44(2), 224- 238.
Mpungose, C. B. (2021). Lecturers’ reflections on the use of Zoom video conferencing technology for e-learning at a South African university in the context of coronavirus. African Identities, 1-17.
Murphy, M., & Matas, C. P. (2009). Politeness in the intercultural e-mail communication. In Handbook of research on e-learning methodologies for language acquisition (pp. 253-270). IGI Global.
Salas- Pilco .A. Z, Yang. Y & Zhang. Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53, 593-619. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
Wisker, G., McGinn, M. K., Bengtsen, S. S., Lokhtina, I., He, F., Cornér, S., ... & Löfström, E. (2021). Remote doctoral supervision experiences: Challenges and affordances. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(6), 612- 623.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences