CAN ONE SPEAK OF TELEOLOGY IN PLATO?
PDF/A (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Teleology
Plato
Phaedo
Timaeus

How to Cite

Brisson, L. (2021). CAN ONE SPEAK OF TELEOLOGY IN PLATO?. Journal of Teleological Science, 1(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.59079/jts.v1i1.5

Abstract

I would like to investigate here on an interpretive trend, one that invokes “teleology,” a compound term whose first element derives from the Greek telos, “end,” and the second from logos, “explanation”; the term ultimately refers to the final cause in Aristotle. The term “teleology” has become a relentless formula among those who now focus on Plato, Aristotle, and even the Stoics. In Plato, three places are particularly targeted: the autobiography of Socrates in the Phaedo (96e-99d), the Timaeus, and book X of the Laws. In this work in progress, I will limit myself to the Timaeus. I have worked hard on the Timaeus and, from the beginning, I wanted to read this text in and for itself, removing the thick layer of interpretations that, since the time of Aristotle, has covered this very original and enigmatic text.

https://doi.org/10.59079/jts.v1i1.5
PDF/A (Português (Brasil))

References

Baltes Matthias, « Gégonen (Platon, Tim. 28b7). Ist die Welt real entstanden oder nicht ? », in: Algra K., Van der Horst P. W. and D.-Runia (eds.), Polyhistor. Studies in the History of Ancient Philosophy, presented to Jaap Mansfeld, Leiden / New York / Köln : Brill, 1996, 88. https://amzn.to/3euIEZK

Betegh Gábor, « Tale, heology and Teleology in the Phaedo », in: Partenie Catalin (ed.), Plato’s Myths, Cambridge / New York : Cambridge University Press, 2009, p. 77-100.

Brisson Luc, Le Même et l’Autre dans la structure ontologique du Timée de Platon. Un commentaire systématique du Timée de Platon [1974], Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 1998. https://amzn.to/3b7d0zl

Brisson Luc & Meyerstein F. Walter, Inventer l’univers. Le problème de la connaissance et les modèles cosmologiques, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, L’âne d’or, 1991. Traduction en anglais sous le titre Inventing the Universe, Albany: Suny Press, 1995. https://amzn.to/3eW21tq https://amzn.to/3f60fpF

Brisson Luc, « Un si long anonymat », in: Narbonne Jean-Marc et Langlois Luc (éd.), La métaphysique. Son histoire, sa critique, ses enjeux, Actes du congrès de l’Association des Sociétés de philosophie de langue française, Université Laval-Québec, 18-24 août 1998, Paris/ Québec: Vrin / Presses de l’Université Laval, 1999, p. 37-60. https://amzn.to/3bc1XVH

Brisson Luc, « Plato’s Theory of Sense Perception in the Timaeus. How It Works and What It Means » [1997], in: Cleary J. and Gurtler G. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 13, Lanham / New York / London : University Press of America, 1999, p. 147-176. https://amzn.to/3vTlSka

Brisson Luc, « Aristote, Physique IV 2 » [1997], repris dans Lectures de Platon, Paris: Vrin, 2000, p. 99-110. https://amzn.to/3evGzNe

Brisson Luc, « La notion philosophique de phthónos chez Platon» [1996], repris dans Lectures de Platon, Paris : Vrin, 2000, p. 219-234. https://amzn.to/3evGzNe

Brisson Luc, « How and Why Do the Building Blocks of the Universe Change Constantly in Plato’s Timaeus (51a-61c) ? », in: Natali Carlo e Maso Stefano (a cura di), Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo, Amsterdam : Hakkert, 2003, p. 189-204 et figures.

Brisson Luc, « La “matière” chez Platon et dans la tradition platonicienne », in: Giovannozzi Delina e Veneziani Marco (a cura di), Materia, XIII Colloquio Internazionale, Roma, 7-8-9 gennaio 2010, Firenze : Leo S. Olschki editore, Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, 2011, p. 1-40.

Brisson Luc, « Why is the Timaeus called an eikôs muthos and an eikôs logos? », in: Collobert Catherine, Destrée Pierre and Gonzalez Francisco J. (eds.), Plato and Myth. Studies in the Use and Status of Platonic Myths, Leiden / Boston : Brill, 2012, p. 369-391. https://amzn.to/3xVMa71

Brisson Luc, « Clement and Cyril of Alexandria: Confronting Platonism with Christianism », in: Vinzent Markus (ed.), Studia Patristica. Papers Presented at the Sixtieth International Conference on Patristic Studies Held in Oxford 2001, vol. 6, Studia patristica, 58, Neoplatonism and Patristics, Leuven : Peeters, 2013, p. 19-44.

Broadie Sarah, Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://amzn.to/3nXQXjL

Brumbaugh Robert S., « Plato’s Relation to the Arts and Crafts », in: Werkmeister W. H. (ed.), Facets of Plato’ philosophy, Assen: Van Gorcum, Phronesis, Suppl. II, 1976, p. 40-52. https://amzn.to/3tDIsf7

Burnyeat Myles F., « Eikos muthos », Rhizai, 2, 2005, p. 143-165.

Carone Gabriela R., « Teleology and Evil in Laws 10 », Review of Metaphysics, 48, 1994-1995, p. 275-298.

Chen Chung Hwan, « Plato’s Theistic Teleology », Anglican Theological Review, 43, 1961, p. 71-87.

Cherniss Harold F., Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, New York : Russell & Russell, 1944. https://amzn.to/3xVfwlP

Cooper John M., « Aristotle on Natural Teleology », in: Schofield M. and Nussbaum M. C. (eds.), Language and logos. Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen, Cambridge, 1982, p. 197-222. https://amzn.to/3vTmzKi

Cornford Francis M., Plato’s Cosmology, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1937. https://amzn.to/3hiLm66

Cresswell Maxwell J., « Plato’s Theory of Causality. Phaedo 95-106 », Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 19, 1971, p. 244-249.

Ferrari Franco, « Causa paradigmatica e causa eicient. Il ruolo delle idee nel Timeo », in: Natali Carlo e Maso Stefano (a cura di), Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo, Amsterdam: Hakkert, 2003, p. 83-96.

Festugière André J., Contemplation et vie contemplative selon Platon, Paris: Vrin, 1936. https://amzn.to/2RDR1c9

Franklin Lee, « Techne and Teleology in Plato’s Gorgias », Apeiron, 38, 2005, p. 229-255.

Frede Michael, « The Original Notion of Cause », in: Schofield M., Burnyeat M. and Barnes J. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, Oxford, 1980, p. 217-249. https://amzn.to/3o0TTvP

Fronterotta Francesco (ed.), La scienza e le cause a partire dalla Metaisica di Aristotele, Napoli: Bibliopolis, collana Elenchos, 54, 2010. https://amzn.to/2R1SYze

Graham Daniel W., « Socrates, the Craft Analogy, and Science », Apeiron, 24, 1991, p. 1-24.

Hackforth Reginald, « Plato’s Theism » [1936], in : Allen R. E. (ed.), Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, London : Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965, p. 439-447. https://amzn.to/3hbSnpt

Johansen Thomas K., Plato’s Natural Philosophy. A Study of the Timaeus-Critias, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. https://amzn.to/3vON17E

Johansen Thomas K., « The Place of the Demiurge in Plato’s Teleology », in: Natali Carlo e Maso Stefano (a cura di), Plato physicus. Cosmologie e antropologia nel Tieme, Amsterdam: Hakkert, 2003, p. 83-96.

Lennox James G., « Plato’s Unnatural Teleology », in: O’Meara Dominic J. (ed.), Platonic Investigations, Washington: The Catholic University of America, 1985, p. 195-218. https://amzn.to/3bcNBEq

Mackenzie Mary M., « Impasse and Explanation; from the Lysis to the Phaedo », Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 70, 1988, p. 15-45.

Menn Stephen, Plato on God as Nous, Carbondale (Illinois): Southern Illinois University Press, The Journal of the History of Philosophy Monograph Series, 1995. https://amzn.to/3xYJ3em

Michalewski Alexandra, La puissance de l’intelligible. La théorie plotinienne des Formes au miroir de l’héritage médioplatonicien, Leuven : Leuven University Press, 2014. https://amzn.to/3eqhAKZ

Natali Carlo & Maso Stefano (a cura di), Antiaristotelismo, Amsterdam : Hakkert, 1999.

Natali Carlo & Maso Stefano (a cura di), Plato physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo, 2003.

Natali Carlo & Maso Stefano (a cura di), La catena delle cause. Determinismo e antideterminismo nel pensiero antico et in quello contemporaneo, 2005.

Payne Andrew, « The teleology of the Ascent in Plato’s Symposium », Apeiron, 41, 2008, p. 123-146.

Philonenko Alexis, « L’antinomie du jugement téléologique », Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 82, 1977, p. 13-37; repris dans Études kantiennes, Paris : Vrin, 1982.

Sedley David N., « Teleology and Myth in the Phaedo », Boston Area Colloquium, 5, 1989, p. 359-383.

Sedley David N., « Socrates’ Place in the History of Teleology », Elenchos, 29, 2008, p. 317-334.

Sedley David N., Creationism, and its Critics in Antiquity, Berkeley / Los Angeles / London : University of California Press, 2007. https://amzn.to/3uvBvOi

Strange Steven K., « The Double Explanation in the Timaeus », Ancient Philosophy, 5, 1985, 25-39.

Wiggins David, « Teleology and the Good in Plato’s Phaedo », Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 4, 1986, p. 1-18. https://amzn.to/3xTWZq5

Woodfield Andrew, Teleology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. https://amzn.to/33sFG1i

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Teleological Science

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.