Abstract
This article contributes to the debate on the relation of Aristotle’s practical and theoretical philosophy. It argues that his practical philosophy depends to a considerable extent on his teleological conception of nature. This thesis is primarily directed against scholars who maintain that Aristotle does not derive political and human relations from natural or cosmic conditions. The paper defends David Sedley’s anthropocentric interpretation of Aristotle’s natural teleology and shows how Aristotle applies teleological explanations to power relations among human beings – among men and women and among freemen and natural slaves – and their purposes and goals. The article focuses on Aristotle’s human ‘function’ (ergon) argument, which is a teleological argument at the center of his practical philosophy. It argues that this argument, which Aristotle presents to define ‘human flourishing’ or ‘happiness’ (eudaimonia), depends on his definition of man as the only ‘living being that has language and reason’ (zôon logon echon). It further claims that the dispute about whether Aristotle identifies eudaimonia only with a life of contemplation or whether eudaimonia includes a political life can be clarified by referring to the natural purpose of logos.
References
Ackrill, John L. 1980. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. by Amélie Oksenberg Rorty, 15–33. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Aristotle, 2017. Protrepticus or Exhortation to Philosophy. Citations, Fragments, Paraphrases, and Other Evidence, ed. by D. S. Hutchinson and Monte Ransome Johnson (http://www.protrepticus.info/protr2017x20.pdf; accessed Dec. 1 2022).
Barker, Ernest. 1959. The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle. New York: Russel & Russel.
Bien, Günther. 1980. Die Grundlegung der politischen Philosophie bei Aristoteles. Freiburg (Breisgau) and Munich: Alber.
Gomez-Lobo, Alfonso. 1989. “The Ergon Inference.” Phronesis 34 (1): 170–84.
Gotthelf, Allan. 1987. “Aristotle’s Conception of Final Causality.” In Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, ed. by Allan Gotthelf and James G. Lennox, 204–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinaman, Robert. 1988. “Eudaimonia and Self-Sufficiency in the ‘Nicomachean Ethics’.” Phronesis 33 (1), 31–53.
Henry, Devin and Karen Margrethe Nielsen (eds.). 2015. Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, Christoph. 1998. Antike Lebenskunst. Glück und Moral von Sokrates bis zu den Neuplatonikern. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Irwin, T. H. 1980. “The Metaphysical and Psychological Basis of Aristotle’s Ethics.’ In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. by Amélie Oksenberg Rorty, 35–53. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Johnson, Monte Ransome. 2005. Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kamp, Andreas. 1985. Die politische Philosophie des Aristoteles und ihre metaphyischen Grundlagen: Wesenstheorie und Polisordnung. Freiburg: Karl Alber.
Karbowski, Joseph. 2019. “Political Animals and Human Nature in Aristotle’s Politics.” In Aristotle’s Anthropology, ed. by Geert Keil and Nora Kreft, 221–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keil, Geert and Nora Kreft. 2019. “Introduction: Aristotle’s Anthropology.” In Aristotle’s Anthropology, ed. by Geert Keil and Nora Kreft, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keyt, David. 1991. “Three Basic Theorems in Aristotle’s Politics.” In A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, ed. by David Keyt and Fred D. Miller, Jr., 119–41. Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell.Knoll, Manuel. 2009. Aristokratische oder demokratische Gerechtigkeit? Die politische Philosophie des Aristoteles und Martha Nussbaums egalitaristische Rezeption. Munich and Paderborn: Fink.
Knoll, Manuel. 2011. “Die Politik des Aristoteles – eine unitarische Interpretation.” Zeitschrift für Politik (ZfP) 2: 123–47.
Knoll, Manuel. 2017. “Aristotle’s Arguments for his Political Anthropology and the Natural Existence of the Polis.” In Aristote, L’animal politique, ed. by Refik Güremen and Annick Jaulin, 31–57. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
Knoll, Manuel. 2020. “The Political Struggle for a Well-Ordered City and Soul as a Historical Striving for Peace. Plato and Aristotle on War and Peace.” In Wherefrom does History Emerge?, ed. by Tilo Schabert and John von Heyking, 39–56. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.
Kullmann, Wolfgang. 1991. “Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle.” In A Companion to Aristotle’s “Politics”, ed. by David Keyt and Fred D. Miller, Jr., 94–117, Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell (first published in Hermes 108, 1980, 419–43).
Kullmann, Wolfgang. 1995. “Theoretische und politische Lebensform.“ In Aristoteles: Die Nikomachische Ethik (Klassiker Auslegen 2), ed. by Otfried Höffe, 253–76. Berlin: Akademie.
Labarrière, Jean-Louis. 1990. “De la Phronèsis animale.” In Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, ed. by Daniel Devreux and Pierre Pellegrin, 405–428. Paris: CNRS.
Leunissen, Mariska. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leunissen, Mariska. 2017. “Biology and Teleology in Aristotle’s Account of the City.” In Teleology in the Ancient World. Philosophical and Medical Approaches, ed. by Julius Rocca, 107–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leunissen, Mariska. 2020. “Teleology in Aristotle.” In Teleology. A History, ed. by Jeffrey K. McDonough, 39–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lisi, Francisco L. “Theoretical Life, Practical Life, and Happiness in Aristotle.” In Theoria. Studies on the Status and Meaning of Contemplation of Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. by Pierre Destrée and Marco Zingano, 241–254. Louvain: Peeters.
Lockwood, Thornton. 2021. “Aristotle’s Politics on Greeks and Non-Greeks.” The Review of Politics 83 (4): 465–85.
MacDowell, John. 1995. “Eudaimonism and Realism in Aristotle’s Ethics.” In Aristotle and Moral Realism, ed. by Robert Heinaman, 201–18, Boulder: Westview Press.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory. Second Edition (original 1981). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Miller Jr., Fred D., 1995. Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s ‘Politics’. Oxford: Clarendon.
Müller, Jörn. 2019. “Spot the Differences! The Hidden Philosophical Anthropology in Aristotle’s Biological Writings.” In Aristotle’s Anthropology, ed. by Geert Keil and Nora Kreft, 118–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Natali, Carlo. 2001. The Wisdom of Aristotle. Trans. by G. Parks. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Natali, Carlo. 2010. “‘Posterior Analytics’ and the Definition of Happiness in ‘NE’ I.” Phronesis 55 (4): 304–24.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1978. Aristotle’s De motu animalium. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1990. “Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution.” In Aristoteles’ “Politik”. Akten des XI. Symposium Aristotelicum, Friedrichshafen/Bodensee, 25.8.–3.9. 1987, ed. Günther Patzig, 152–86. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1995. “Aristotle on Human Nature and the Foundation of Ethics.” In World, Mind, and Ethics. Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, ed. J. E. J. Altham and Ross Harrison, 86–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ottmann, Henning. 2001. Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Die Griechen. Von Platon bis zum Hellenismus, Vol. 1/2, Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
Pellegrin, Pierre. 2015. “Is Politics a Natural Science?” In Aristotle’s Politics: A Critical Guide, ed. by Thornton Lockwood and Thanassis Samaras, 27–45, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pellegrin, Pierre. 2017. “Y a-t-il une sociobiologie aristotélicienne?” In Aristote, l’animal politique, ed. by Refik Güremen and Annick Jaulin, 13–33, Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
Pellegrin, Pierre. 2020. Endangered Excellence. On the Political Philosophy of Aristotle. Trans. by A. Preus. Albany: State University of New York Press (first published in French 2017).
Sedley, David. 1991. “Is Aristotle’s Teleology Anthropocentric?” Phronesis 36 (2): 179–96.
Sedley, David. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shields, Christopher. 2015. “The Science of Soul in Aristotle’s Ethics.” In Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, ed. by Devin Henry and Karen Margrethe Nielsen, 232–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sorabji, Richard. 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. London: Duckworth.
Sorabji, Richard. 2006. “Just War from Ancient Origins to the Conquistadores Debate and its Modern Relevance.” In The Ethics of War: Shared Problems in Different Traditions, ed. Richard Sorabji and David Rodin, 13–29. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Steiner, Gary. 2005. Anthropocentricism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Trott, Adriel M. 2014. Aristotle on the Nature of Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yack, Bernard. 1991. “A Reinterpretation of Aristotle’s Political Teleology.” History of Political Thought 12 (1): 15–33.
Yack, Bernard. 1993. The Problems of a Political Animal. Community, Justice and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Teleological Science